<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://mail.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Riverside</title>
 <link>http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/riverside</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Population Dispersion Continues in Riverside-San Bernardino, San Diego and Sacramento</title>
 <link>http://mail.newgeography.com/content/002103-population-dispersion-continues-riverside-san-bernardino-san-diego-and-sacramento</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Population growth continued the strongest in the suburban  areas of Riverside-San Bernardino, San Diego and Sacramento, while unusually  strong growth occurred in the historical core municipalities, all of which are  dominated by a suburban urban form.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Riverside-San  Bernardino: &lt;/strong&gt;Riverside-San Bernardino experienced by far the fastest growth  of any metropolitan area in California, at 30 percent from 2000 to 2010. This  growth rate placed the metropolitan area otherwise known locally as the  &amp;quot;Inland Empire&amp;quot; fourth in growth rate among the 26 reporting major  metropolitan areas, behind Raleigh, Las Vegas and Austin. The Riverside-San  Bernardino metropolitan area grew from a population of 3,255,000 in 2000 to  4,225,000 in 2010. At the growth rates of the past decade, Riverside-San  Bernardino would pass San Francisco, to become the state&#039;s second largest  metropolitan area by 2012.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Riverside-San Bernardino is virtually an all suburban  metropolitan area. The historical core municipality of San Bernardino grew 11.4  percent, from 188,000 in 2000 to 210,000 in 2010, capturing two percent of the  metropolitan area growth. Suburban areas accounted for 98 percent of the  growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;San Diego: &lt;/strong&gt;The  San Diego metropolitan area grew 10 percent from 2000 to 2010, rising from  2,814,000 to 3,095,000. This growth rate was nearly double or more than that of  the other major coastal metropolitan areas in California (Los Angeles, San  Francisco and San Jose). Even so, the actual population count was approximately  130,000 below the California State Department of Finance estimate. We had  previously questioned the aggressive population projections released by the  State Department of Finance in an &lt;em&gt;Orange  County Register &lt;/em&gt;op-ed, &lt;a href=&quot;http://articles.ocregister.com/2007-08-24/opinion/24697118_1_population-growth-domestic-migrants-domestic-residents&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;60 Million Californians: Don&#039;t Bet on It&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  The historical core municipality grew 6.9 percent from  1,223,000 to 1,307,000 and, as in 2000 is the nation&#039;s eighth largest  municipality (having been passed by San Antonio and having passed Dallas). The  city of San Diego, with a largely suburban urban form, attracted 30 percent of  the metropolitan area population growth. The California State Department of  Finance estimate for the city was much higher, at 1,376,000, indicating an  estimate of two new residents for every actual resident counted. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  &lt;strong&gt;Sacramento: &lt;/strong&gt;The  Sacramento metropolitan area grew strongly between 2000 and 2010, at 19.6  percent. The population rose from 1,797,000 to 2,149,000, adding more new  residents than the much larger combined metropolitan areas of San Francisco and  San Jose.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The historical core municipality of Sacramento grew from  407,000 to 466,000 (a gain of 14.6 percent) and accounted for 17 percent of the  metropolitan population growth. Suburban areas grew 21.1 percent and accounted  for 83 percent of the metropolitan area growth.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://mail.newgeography.com/content/002103-population-dispersion-continues-riverside-san-bernardino-san-diego-and-sacramento#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/california">California</category>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/census-2010">Census 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/demographics">demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/population">population</category>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/riverside">Riverside</category>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/sacramento">Sacramento</category>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/san-bernardino">San Bernardino</category>
 <category domain="http://mail.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/san-diego">San Diego</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:48:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2103 at http://mail.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
